Has India failed to safeguard welfare of women?

Share Button

By Vivek Menezes

Uproar raged all through this week after the release of an obviously flawed international survey by the Thomson Reuters Foundation, which ranked India the world’s most dangerous country for women. It was immediately clear the methodology was highly questionable, with no application of actual data, but instead relying entirely on the opinions of 548 “experts” (41 from India). Together, they listed “the world’s largest democracy” dead last after considering six categories that affect women’s welfare: Healthcare, discrimination, cultural traditions, sexual violence, non-sexual violence and human trafficking.
In its official response, the Union ministry of Women and Child Development headed by Maneka Gandhi retorted angrily to what it called an “effort to malign the nation and draw attention away from real improvements in recent years”.

Even beyond the dubious “opinion poll” method of deriving results, the kind of ranking system used by Thomson Reuters is absurd. How could a democracy like India (or the US, which ranked an astonishing 10th worst in the world) be compared directly to totalitarian regimes where women are denied basic rights by fiat, or war-devastated countries where basic survival is under constant threat? Still, as pointed out by Geeta Pander of the BBC, “The government has been quick to question the survey, but India has no reason to gloat – a look at the official crime statistics for 2016 shows a woman was raped every 13 minutes, six women were gangraped every day, a bride was murdered for dowry every 69 minutes, and 19 women were attacked with acid every month.”

Even beyond horrific crime statistics – which skew worse in north Indian states – there are many worrisome indicators that women in India are besieged by multiple hazards. The most basic is malnutrition, where the country fares abysmally, even when compared to neighbouring Bangladesh and Pakistan. According to the latest United Nations data, 51.4% of Indian women of reproductive age are chronically anaemic, which directly translates to almost 40% of the children in the country being clinically “stunted” (long-term nutritional deprivation affecting mental development and intellectual capacity). This is beyond crisis. It is a national failure on an epic scale.

Parse the data even further, and deeply entrenched cultural cruelties quickly emerge. Earlier this year, the United Nations issued the results of studying gender equality in 89 countries. The global scenario is a mixed bag, but India’s record is a catalogue of horrors, all of which are exacerbated by staggering inequalities on the planet. For example, the average age of death for upper-caste women is 54 years (itself bad in a world where the equivalent is above 80 in over 40 other countries). But for dalit women, the average age of death is almost a full decade-and-a-half lower, 39.5 years.

Forget the silly Reuters opinion poll. This data is the strongest possible indictment of Indian society’s failure to safeguard the welfare of women. But still there is more that is manifested by absence. These are the millions of women who do not live due to female foeticide and infanticide that persists in many states in India. According to the ministry of statistics and programme implementation, “The reduction in sex ratio of youth is found to be much more than that of the overall population. It has come down to 939 in 2011 as compared to 961 in 1971, and is projected to decline further to 904 in 2021 and 898 in 2031.” In Haryana, there are already fewer than 860 women per 1,000 males.
Here in Goa, there are both, positive and negative trends apparent. While the overall figures are better than the national average, the Catholic minority is 1,129 women per 1,000 men, while the Hindu majority is only 929.
The writer is a photographer and widely published columnist. Views expressed are personal.
Share Button

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*